PACIFIC RUBBER & PACKING · EST. 1979

Any seal, standard or custom.
Clean when you need it.

Forty-seven years of elastomer sourcing, engineering, and delivery — from a same-day O-ring to a custom bonded assembly. Over seventeen million parts in stock, in-house manufacturing and metrology, and ISO Class 7 cleanroom processing for the applications that demand it. Surface particulate burden measured, counted, verified.

seal contamination risk

17M+

O-RINGS IN STOCK

24hr

TYPICAL LEAD TIME

ISO 7

IN-HOUSE CLEANROOM

1979

FAMILY-OWNED SINCE
The particle you didn’t count is the one that triggers the investigation.

Your seals are not as clean as you think.

High purity process flows are significantly impacted by particulate smaller than 20µ, smaller than 10µ, than 5µ.

Visual inspection for surface defects and molding workmanship is limited to 2X magnification. Surface particulate smaller than 50µ is not visible at this magnification.

We control, count, and quantify particulate down to 1.3µ. What do we typically find? All kinds of culprits…

127,500

particles per cm² (≥1µm)

11

primary particle sources

20x

variability from the same bag

6

major risk modalities
It’s OK, my seals are already cleaned.

Really? If you can’t measure cleaning efficiency, you can’t manage it.

Most seals in high purity applications get a “factory wash” or “IPA wipe.” The assumptions start. How controlled is your process? We see particle load variability of over 20x from seals pulled from the same bag.

seal cleanliness under microscope
EPDM surface comparison
What kind of particles are on the surface of a seal?

Smaller than you can see

All kind of culprits

Contaminant Material Type Size Range Supply Chain Origin
Carbon Black Amorphous carbon agglomerates 0.01–100 μm Compounding ingredient; surface liberation by wear/shear
Talcum Powder Mg₃Si₄O₁₀(OH)₂ (lamellar) 1–20 μm Compounding filler; mold dusting agent; anti-tack
Mold Release Oils Silicone or fluorocarbon film N/A (film) External mold release agent; internal compound additive
Cryogenic Grit Polycarbonate fragments 5–50 μm Deflashing media degradation; electrostatic adhesion
Loose Flash Cured elastomer shards 10–>500 μm Deflashing process residual; trimming debris
Skin Squames Desquamated epithelial tissue 20–50 μm Operator handling in non-controlled environments
Respiratory Salts Protein/mineral crystals 1–10 μm Operator respiratory aerosol deposition
Human Sebum Fatty acid/lipid film N/A (film) Direct contact transfer from operator hands
Textile Fibers Cotton/polyester PPE debris 50–>2000 μm Garment shedding during handling and packaging
Cardboard Fibers Cellulosic fragments 30–500 μm Packaging material shed into product contact zone
Floor Grit Silica/mineral dust 1–>100 μm Ambient environmental deposition; packaging ingress
Particles remain after characterization.

They cycle into your process. Over months.

A seal is designed to move in its groove – over pressure cycles, thermal swings. This movement exposes a much higher wetted surface area than most process engineer account for. Scrubbing and fluid entrainment cycle with pressure. Start up characterization doesn’t flush all the particulate at once. It moves from the seal, from the gland, over a period of time. Count how many seals are in your critical flow stack. Tens, hundreds, continuously contributing contamination over time. Explain some of those post-commissioning business interruption events you’ve been fighting?

Solution: Measure it before you can manage it.

We will show you how. You can do this yourself. Here’s exactly what it takes.

A rigorous seal contamination baseline evaluation is achievable with the right expertise, equipment, and time. Every step below is real work. We’re giving you the full picture — because understanding what’s involved is the only honest way to make the build-vs-buy decision.

pouring liquid in lab

01

Source elastomer surface extraction expertise

Identify expertise in particle extraction methods optimized for the surface energy and morphology of your specific elastomer type. The extraction method matters — a method miscalibrated for your material will undercount or damage the surface.

02

Select the SKU of most concern

Identify the seal SKU in your current supply chain that presents the highest risk to your fluid system — highest pressure cycling, smallest downstream channel geometry, or tightest contamination budget.

03

Run individual as-received extractions — n≥12

Perform a statistically relevant number of individualized seal particle extractions (12 minimum). Individual extractions — not batch — are essential: they reveal the seal-to-seal variability within a single bag or lot that population-level sampling will always miss.

04

Obtain a baseline — this is harder than it sounds

To contextualize your results, you need a statistically meaningful baseline of as-received particle burden for your specific elastomer type, sourced from standard or source controlled commercial supply channels. This data does not exist in any published standard or public database. You will need to build it yourself — or find a partner who already has it.

05

Develop & validate a cleaning process — n≥12

Test the efficacy of the cleaning methodology you have developed with another statistically relevant set of individual extractions. Individual counts let you analyze cleaning effectiveness seal-to-seal — not just on average.

06

Catalogue in meaningful particle size bins

Record particle count and volume across useful size bins from <1µm through 50µm+. Size distribution matters: a system with 10µm channel geometry is indifferent to 50µm particles — and acutely sensitive to 2µm ones.

07

Compile the full data table

All results. All seals. All bins. As-received and cleaned, side-by-side. This becomes your qualification record — the document that either closes the loop or opens the investigation.

08

Translate raw data for the decision-maker

Have your data visualization team interpret the results in a way the manager who funded this evaluation can act on. Base the presentation on the particulate risk threshold specific to your application — not just the numbers in isolation.

09

Retain golden samples for 3 years

Store reference samples of your original as-received seals and your cleaned seals. Should further investigation, regulatory audit, or failure analysis require it — your evidence chain depends on this.

10

Solicit a technical consult

Engage an expert to ensure you’re extracting the most actionable intelligence from the data — understand the implications for your operational risk and the choices available to you going forward.

11

$23,000+

Minimum cost estimate

0.7 FTE

Engineer allocation

8–10 wks

Calendar time

∞Time to build

Step 4 baseline from scratch

Assumes you: find the right extraction methodology on the first attempt, have laboratory access, and can source the baseline data in Step 4. Most teams cannot. That step alone adds months — if it’s achievable at all.

Or – We already built it. Weeks, not months.
A fraction of the cost. Done.